Nº. 1 of  11

Ephemerality


Ephemeralness: lasting a very short time;
short-lived; transitory;


- flickr
- twitter.
I post/reblog all kinds of stuff.
Things you might be interested in:
TV
Books
Politics
Quotes
Proud Anglophile

Posts tagged broadway:

As [director] Lonny Price always says to me, Musicals have to be ‘north of the floor.’ The reason people sing must be larger than life. Musicals have to raise you up, there’s an emotional lift they have to bring you. You have to say, Yes, this sings. This is a musical. People give me stuff all the time and say, ‘I want to make a musical out of this.’ Most of the time, I don’t agree. I’m always saying ‘Metaphor, metaphor!’ The lyrics aren’t ‘Look how old we are,’ the lyric is ‘Send in the clowns.’ Imagery that illuminates a character in a wonderful way — imagery you can sing. It’s ‘defying gravity’ not ‘I’m hoping I can fly and can get off the ground.’ I hate the expression ‘a hook,’ but … It’s not a hook, it’s a metaphor. Something poetic that takes the emotional state of the character and lifts it into song.

—Robyn Goodman, producer (‘Avenue Q,’ the upcoming reimagining of Rodgers and Hammerstein’s ‘Cinderella’)

(Source: vulture.com, via dumloud)

This pilot implicitly urges us to believe that fresh-faced McPhee and her small, breathy voice are actually superior to Hilty’s singing-to-the-back-row style – not just for the sake of the narrative conflict, but for the sake of the show’s overall style. From High School Musical to Glee, musical theater in contemporary media has become a punchline, its songs and traditions reworked into airy pop confections that disdain their origins.

NBC’s SMASH: Not Exactly Smashing | Antenna

This. This was my biggest problem with the SMASH pilot, and will probably continue to be my biggest problem. 

(Source: fyeahbdj)

popculturebrain:

Watch: Behind the Scenes of Smash Performing Rihanna’s ‘Cheers (I’ll Drink To That)’ | HuffPost TV, Playbill

There’s quite a bit of discussion of the show-within-the-show becoming an actual show.

oppreciate:

fuckyeahstephensondheim:

Just saw this. Love the three leads, but it sure is an interesting choice to cast them so old.

I want to go to there.

Someone buy me a ticket to Cincinnati? Please?

So I only live 6 hours from Cincinnati now. Interesting. 

(Source: so-theres-hell-to-pay, via dotseurat)

[Flash 9 is required to listen to audio.]

Alice Ripley, You Have to Be There (Skinner/Ripley Live at Town Hall)

I’ll just leave that there. Palette cleansing. 

I can not. I listened to the first twenty seconds to confirm it’s the same “You Have To Be There.” 

dainty-june:

“Maggie, I don’t audition anymore.”

Seriously Maggie. Patti LuPawn doesn’t show up to open calls. Remember that time she did Evita six times a week, finished doing the Saturday evening show, then rolled over to Les Mouches to do a midnight cabaret act? Like a fucking boss. 

(via charlottemalcolm)

gloccamorras:

corahooverhooper:

cogsworthylemon:

dotseurat:

themonkeysandwho:

givesmevoice:

blerggg:

sing-happy:

Remind me to never, ever make him angry.

But he uses the phrase fuddy-duddy. I’m obsessed.

Oh fuck.

THIS IS A CRISIS OF THE GODS.

But seriously though, in my own littler universe, Sondheim and McDonald are co-gods.

THERE IS NO DRILL FOR WHEN YOUR BIGGEST  THEATRICAL INSPIRATIONS CLASH

ABORT MISSION

I have second-hand embarrassment for the creative team and cast, because it’s pretty much the equivalent of God coming down and telling you you’re doing it wrong and need to stop. Mortifying.

I just imagine him sitting in a gigantic throne, flanked by Bernadette and Patti, and all he says is a booming “NO”.

I’m pretty sure everyone in creative has crawled into hovels by now. Hell, I think I would too.

The cast is what really excited me about this production. When I heard that they were interpreting it to be more musical theatre and less operetta, I was extremely skeptical but still excited to hear that it was being brought to Broadway after its ART run. Now, I hear all of Sondheim’s points and the actual name of the production (What is going on there?) and am kind of disappointed. I’m still thrilled to hear Norm Lewis and Audra McDonald in these roles, but if it’s not in the right production, I feel as if it’s diminishing the potential of their performances.

Wow. Just, wow. Awkward. I’m glad he still respects Norm and Audra to think so highly of their abilities to perform these iconic character, but still passionately agrees with the vision of the production. But whew, I totally agree with what givesmevoice said.

Ouch. I really didn’t realize all of the changes that the show is going through until I read this (and I do agree with Sondheim about the negative changes), and I can definitely see where he is coming from though. But I do feel embarrassed for the cast and creative team, especially Norm and Audra. 

Some of these changes might be negative but…this is what ART does (Lizzie? Lilla? One of you knew a lot more about this). So I say reserve judgement until after people have actually seen this (I don’t know much about show and I realize some of these changes sound not good but still).

I think this is the take away point: “but there is a difference between reinterpretation and wholesale rewriting.”

Changing the fucking ending? Of Porgy and Bess? One of the great tragedies? That would be like someone changing the ending of “Romeo and Juliet” and saying they understand that Shakespeare would have come around and re-written it eventually to increase audience satisfaction.* As a lover of great tragedies, I’m pissed. 

* Note: plenty of people have used the bare bones of Romeo and Juliet to create their own stories inspired by that show that work out happily, but they don’t still call them “William Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet.”

(via koolaidmoustache)

Nº. 1 of  11